TruthScan is a kind of platforms that sounds nearly too broad at first.
AI textual content detection, AI picture detection, deepfake detection, voice detection, e mail rip-off detection — it’s a whole “AI authenticity” suite, not only a single checker. And in contrast to loads of light-weight detectors that really feel like pastime initiatives, TruthScan positions itself as an enterprise device from day one.
This evaluation is supposed to reply the one query that issues: does it really work — and if that’s the case, for who?
To maintain this convenient (and never simply one other characteristic dump), this evaluation contains:
- A transparent testing methodology (with area for actual outcomes)
- Comparisons towards different enterprise-level detectors
- What the outcomes imply in the true world (false positives, coverage threat, moderation workflows)
- A verdict that ties straight to check outcomes
Who TruthScan Is
TruthScan markets itself as an enterprise AI detection and content material safety platform — and it backs that up with enterprise language throughout the location: SOC 2 Sort II compliance, API integration, assist tiers, deployment choices, and SLAs.
That framing issues. A detector that’s “adequate” for private checks can nonetheless be a legal responsibility in schooling, media, compliance, or belief & security.
TruthScan’s pitch is actually: quick, scalable, multi-modal AI detection for organizations that may’t afford to guess.
What TruthScan is (and what it isn’t)
TruthScan is finest understood as a detection suite, not a single AI checker.
The platform helps multimodal detection throughout textual content, pictures, video, and audio, with credit-based utilization (e.g., per-word for textual content, per-image for pictures).
The instruments most related to this evaluation:
AI Textual content Detector
Designed to flag AI-generated writing (essays, articles, emails, and so on.) and rating chance / confidence. TruthScan additionally claims its fashions are educated to deal with paraphrased or “humanized” AI content material.
AI Picture Detector
Designed to detect AI-generated or manipulated images, and TruthScan’s pricing web page suggests it contains “detection heatmaps & visible evaluation” and a historical past dashboard.
Different Instruments
- AI Electronic mail Detector
- AI Voice Detector
- Deepfake Detection
- Pretend Receipt Detection
Pricing and Credit Construction
TruthScan presents a free trial with 20,000 credit and no bank card required. Paid plans begin at $49/month for 1,000,000 credit, and scale upward, with enterprise choices and quantity reductions.
Credit are utilized in another way by media kind:
- Textual content: 1 credit score per phrase
- Photographs: 1,000 credit per picture
- Video: 50,040 credit per minute
- Audio: 1,500 credit per minute
This issues as a result of “accuracy” with out value context is deceptive. A detector that’s barely higher however 10× costlier will be the flawed alternative for a newsroom or moderation queue.
The factor is — though these credit usually are not free for his or her full product, TruthScan DOES have a free version of their AI picture and textual content detection. No upfront prices in any respect, which is greater than I might say for different free AI detection suites out there.
Testing Methodology
A variety of competitor opinions embrace a outcomes desk — however usually omit a very powerful particulars: how the check was really run.
- The identical content material is examined in the identical order.
- No edits are made between instruments (no “fixing” the textual content or pictures).
- Scores are recorded as-is.
- Any “confidence” labels / sentence-level flags are captured.
- Screenshots are saved for proof
For extra info:
For AI Textual content Detection
Pattern dimension and content material sorts
- Pattern dimension: 8
- Sources of AI textual content: ChatGPT (4) and Gemini (4)
- Common phrase rely per pattern: 500
Competitors
For AI Picture Detection
AI picture check set
- Pattern dimension: 8
- AI picture sources: Midjourney (4) and GPT (4)
Competitors
AI Textual content Detection Check
Check #1
AI-Generated Essay:
TruthScan: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 98%
Sapling: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 100%
Grammarly: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 96%
Check #2
AI-Generated Essay:
TruthScan: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 94%
Sapling: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 100%
Grammarly: AI detector confused.
AI Probability Rating: 57%
Check #3
AI-Generated Essay:
TruthScan: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 99%
Sapling: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 100%
Grammarly: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 75%
Check #4
AI-Generated Essay:
TruthScan: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 95%
Sapling: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 100%
Grammarly: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 100%
Check #5
AI-Generated Essay:
TruthScan: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 93%
Sapling: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 100%
Grammarly: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 92%
Check #6
AI-Generated Essay:
TruthScan: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 95%
Sapling: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 100%
Grammarly: AI detector confused.
AI Probability Rating: 58%
Check #7
AI-Generated Essay:
TruthScan: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 89%
Sapling: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 100%
Grammarly: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 62%
Check #8
AI-Generated Essay:
TruthScan: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 89%
Sapling: Appropriately recognized textual content as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 100%
Grammarly: Incorrectly recognized textual content as human-written.
AI Probability Rating: 39%
The Outcomes
AI Picture Detection
Check #1
TruthScan: Appropriately recognized picture as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 97%
Decopy: Appropriately recognized picture as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 99%
Illuminarty: Incorrectly recognized picture as human-made.
AI Probability Rating: 3%
Check #2
TruthScan: Appropriately recognized picture as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 97%
Decopy: Incorrectly recognized picture as human-made.
AI Probability Rating: 2%
Illuminarty: Incorrectly recognized picture as human-made.
AI Probability Rating: 21.9%
Check #3
TruthScan: Appropriately recognized picture as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 98%
Decopy: Appropriately recognized picture as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 100%
Illuminarty: Appropriately recognized picture as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 89.8%
Check #4
TruthScan: Appropriately recognized picture as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 97%
Decopy: Appropriately recognized picture as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 71%
Illuminarty: Incorrectly recognized picture as human-made.
AI Probability Rating: 3.9%
Check #5
TruthScan: Appropriately recognized picture as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 99%
Decopy: Appropriately recognized picture as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 95%
Illuminarty: Incorrectly recognized picture as human-made.
AI Probability Rating: 21%
Check #6
TruthScan: Appropriately recognized picture as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 99%
Decopy: Appropriately recognized picture as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 100%
Illuminarty: Incorrectly recognized picture as human-made.
AI Probability Rating: 14.3%
Check #7
TruthScan: Appropriately recognized picture as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 99%
Decopy: Appropriately recognized picture as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 100%
Illuminarty: Incorrectly recognized picture as human-made.
AI Probability Rating: 9.8%
Check #8
TruthScan: Appropriately recognized picture as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 99%
Decopy: Appropriately recognized picture as AI-generated.
AI Probability Rating: 99%
Illuminarty: Incorrectly recognized picture as human-made.
AI Probability Rating: 3.3%
The Outcomes
The Backside Line
After working each the AI textual content and AI picture assessments, the primary takeaway is fairly easy: TruthScan is the most consistently strong “all-around” detector on this lineup — and it’s not simply barely profitable. It’s placing up enterprise-level numbers the place it issues.
AI Textual content Outcomes (TruthScan vs Sapling vs Grammarly)
On AI textual content detection, Sapling technically wins — it posted a clear 100% rating, whereas TruthScan landed at 94.38%, and Grammarly trailed at 72.38%.
And credit score the place it’s due: Sapling is genuinely glorious. It’s quick, assured, and on this check set, it didn’t miss.
That mentioned, there’s a sensible catch that issues in actual utilization: Sapling’s free tier truncates enter at round 2,000 characters. Meaning longer essays, full weblog posts, or full-length educational papers usually get chopped — and detection high quality turns into a “partial scan” moderately than a real document-level verdict.
Even with that limitation, Sapling remains to be really good. But it surely’s price calling out as a result of it modifications how usable the device is for most individuals day-to-day.
TruthScan, in the meantime, is doing one thing barely completely different: it’s not making an attempt to “win one class” — it’s making an attempt to be dependable throughout each class.
AI Picture Outcomes (TruthScan vs Decopy vs Illuminarty)
That is the place TruthScan actually flexes.
TruthScan scored 98.13% on AI picture detection — which is truthfully ridiculous in one of the best ways. That’s near-perfect efficiency throughout eight assessments, and it stayed constant from begin to end.
Decopy did solidly at 83.25% — not unhealthy in any respect, and positively usable for informal checks.
Illuminarty, although, got here in at 22.79%, which principally turns it right into a coin flip (or worse) as soon as the pictures get even barely practical.
So if the query is “can TruthScan really detect AI pictures reliably in 2026?” — this check says sure. Loudly.
What the outcomes imply
Although Sapling edges TruthScan within the text-only check, TruthScan remains to be the stronger total advice for one purpose:
TruthScan is elite at AI image detection and nonetheless extremely correct at AI textual content detection.
Sapling is a tremendous textual content detector — nevertheless it’s nonetheless a text-first device, and the free-tier truncation makes it more durable to make use of for full-length, real-world paperwork except it’s upgraded.
TruthScan, alternatively, is doing what a real “suite” ought to do:
- Textual content detection that’s robust sufficient to belief (94.38%)
- Picture detection that’s borderline surgical (98.13%)
- Plus the added worth of being a part of a wider detection platform (real-time monitoring, deepfake/voice/e mail instruments) if a workflow ever wants it
So the ultimate verdict is that this:
If the purpose is the one finest free-tier textual content detector on this precise check, Sapling deserves the crown — even with the character cap.
But when the purpose is essentially the most dependable, most full AI detection device total — particularly when pictures are concerned — TruthScan is the one which looks like the true “2026-grade” answer.
