Amazon Textract is AWS’s machine studying service that reads and processes paperwork mechanically. It does extra than simply flip photographs into textual content like fundamental OCR instruments. You should utilize it to tug knowledge from types and tables, course of each typed and handwritten textual content, work with PDFs and scanned photographs, and deal with multilingual document processing. It even comes with ready-to-use instruments for particular paperwork like invoices, IDs, and lending paperwork.
Our evaluation of real-world implementations revealed Textract’s clear strengths and limitations. It excels at processing structured monetary paperwork and types inside the AWS ecosystem. The pricing begins at $1.50 per 1,000 pages for fundamental textual content extraction, scaling up for specialised doc varieties like invoices or lending paperwork. Alternatively, he platform falls brief relating to:
➡️
1. Accuracy when processing handwritten textual content
2. Prices that scale poorly for big volumes
3. Advanced doc layouts and non-standard formatting
4. Desk extraction with superior formatting
5. Setup requiring AWS experience and ongoing upkeep
Let’s take a look at the highest Textract alternate options that can assist you decide the suitable device in your doc processing wants.
A quick comparability of Amazon Textract alternate options
Sr No. | Product | Foremost characteristic | G2 score | Free trial | Pricing | Whole rating* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Amazon Textract | AWS-native doc processing | 4.4/5 | No | Pay-as-you-go ($1.50 per 1,000 pages) | 43.4 |
2 | Nanonets | Finish-to-end automation with 98% accuracy | 4.8/5 | Sure (500 pages) | Pay-as-you-go, First 500 pages free | 46.5 |
3 | Rossum | Cognitive knowledge seize | 4.4/5 | No | Customized pricing | 43.8 |
4 | Docparser | Rule-based extraction | 4.6/5 | Sure | Begins at $39/month | 44.0 |
5 | Azure DI | Enterprise integration | 4.5/5 | Sure | Pay-as-you-go | 43.2 |
6 | Google Cloud Doc AI | ML-powered processing | 4.2/5 | Sure | Pay-as-you-go | 43.2 |
7 | ABBYY FlexiCapture | Superior OCR capabilities | 4.1/5 | No | Begins at $4,150 (one-time) | 44.3 |
8 | Tungsten Seize | Excessive-volume doc scanning | 4.3/5 | Sure | Customized pricing | 43.0 |
9 | Laserfiche | Enterprise content material administration | 4.7/5 | Sure | Begins at $50/consumer/12 months | 43.9 |
10 | Hyperscience | Human-in-loop workflows | 4.6/5 | No | Customized pricing | 46.3 |
(*Consult with scoring methodology on the backside)
Now, let’s look at every different intimately to grasp their particular strengths, limitations, and ideally suited use circumstances. We’ll analyze how they evaluate to Textract and assist you to decide which resolution most closely fits your doc processing wants.
1. Nanonets
Nanonets is an AI based document processing platform that goes past fundamental OCR to offer end-to-end automation. Not like Textract’s template-based method, we use deep studying to grasp doc context and adapt to new layouts mechanically. Our platform combines OCR, pure language processing, and machine studying to deal with the whole lot from knowledge extraction to workflow automation.
💡
Key options:
1. Clever doc classification and routing
2. Automated knowledge validation and error checking
3. Customized mannequin coaching with as few as 10 samples
4. Pre-built fashions for invoices, receipts, IDs
5. Multi-stage approval workflows
6. Database matching for knowledge verification
7. Automated export to accounting methods
8. Webhook and API integrations
9. Constructed-in human verification instruments
Professionals of Nanonets | Cons of Nanonets |
---|---|
Template-free processing with self-learning fashions | Larger value for low volumes |
Helps 40+ languages | UI will be overwhelming at first |
Pre-trained fashions for widespread paperwork | Studying curve for advanced workflows |
Intensive integration capabilities | |
Robust workflow automation capabilities | |
Constructed-in verification and approval flows | |
Strong API documentation and assist | |
Common mannequin enhancements from corrections |
Pricing: Free tier obtainable for first 500 pages. Professional plan begins at $999/month for 10,000 pages.
Greatest suited to: Mid to giant organizations in finance, healthcare, logistics, and manufacturing sectors processing diverse doc varieties.
How does Nanonets evaluate to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Nanonets |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
9.3 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
9.1 |
8.9 |
High quality of Help |
9.4 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
9.1 |
8.8 |
Product Course (% constructive) |
9.6 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Nanonet if you happen to’re on the lookout for self-learning fashions, in depth workflow automation, and built-in verification instruments to automate your doc processing workflow end-to-end. Nanonets can assist you deal with diverse doc layouts and a number of languages or guarantee seamless knowledge move together with your present enterprise methods.
2. Rossum

Rossum’s method to doc processing entails utilizing cognitive knowledge seize as an alternative of conventional template-based extraction. The platform combines AI-powered understanding with in depth workflow automation to deal with your complete doc lifecycle – from receiving to processing to integration with enterprise methods.
Learn About: Rossum Alternatives and Competitors
💡
Key options:
1. Cognitive knowledge seize with out templates
2. Multi-channel doc receiving
3. Constructed-in exception dealing with workflow
4. Intensive validation guidelines engine
5. Enterprise-grade integrations
6. Customized subject validation
7. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 licensed
8. Two-way communication for exceptions
Professionals of Rossum | Cons of Rossum |
---|---|
No templates wanted for brand new layouts | Larger value for low volumes |
Higher dealing with of advanced paperwork | System glitches throughout updates |
Robust enterprise-grade assist | Slower processing of enormous PDFs |
Constructed-in exception administration | Steeper studying curve initially |
Intensive validation capabilities | Advanced API for tax constructions |
Common AI enhancements | Restricted Excel assist |
Versatile customization choices | |
Strong safety compliance |
Pricing: Enterprise-focused pricing with customized quotes based mostly on quantity. Contains SLA ensures and devoted assist.
Greatest suited to: Organizations throughout manufacturing, retail, and monetary providers that want complete doc automation. Rossum significantly excels in AP departments and shared service facilities processing diverse vendor paperwork.
How does Rossum evaluate to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Rossum |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
8.5 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.0 |
8.9 |
High quality of Help |
9.2 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
8.3 |
8.8 |
Product Course (% constructive) |
9.8 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Rossum if you could course of diverse doc varieties with sturdy validation and compliance controls. The platform significantly shines in accounts payable automation and vendor doc processing the place template upkeep can be impractical.
3. Docparser

Docparser affords a rule-based method utilizing zonal OCR expertise. Whereas Textract makes use of machine studying to grasp paperwork, Docparser enables you to outline precisely how and the place to extract knowledge utilizing customizable parsing guidelines.
💡
Key options:
1. Customizable zonal OCR extraction
2. Superior desk parsing capabilities
3. Sensible doc routing system
4. Pre-built parsing templates
5. Automated knowledge formatting
6. Multi-format doc assist
7. Intensive API entry
Professionals of Docparser | Cons of Docparser |
---|---|
Extra exact extraction management | Requires guide rule setup |
Higher with constant layouts | Restricted AI capabilities |
Stronger desk extraction | Studying curve for setup |
Extra reasonably priced for low volumes | One language at a time |
Less complicated integration choices | Template upkeep wanted |
Fast processing velocity | Not ideally suited for diverse layouts |
Wonderful buyer assist | |
Clear pricing construction |
Pricing: Clear tiered pricing beginning at $39/month for 100 paperwork. Marketing strategy at $159/month for 1,000 paperwork. Enterprise plans obtainable.
Greatest suited to: Small to mid-sized companies processing constant doc codecs, particularly in finance and operations.
How does Docparser evaluate to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Docparser |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
9.0 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.8 |
8.9 |
High quality of Help |
8.9 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
8.7 |
8.8 |
Product Course (% constructive) |
8.5 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Docparser if you happen to want granular management over extraction guidelines and work primarily with structured paperwork. Its rule-based method makes it ideally suited for automated workflows the place paperwork have predictable codecs and also you want exact desk extraction. The platform affords higher worth for smaller doc volumes and gives extra easy integration choices.
4. Azure AI Doc Intelligence

Azure AI Document Intelligence is a part of Microsoft’s cloud platform, Azure, which gives over 200 cloud providers for companies. It represents Microsoft’s enterprise-focused method to doc processing, providing processing capabilities that run each within the cloud and by yourself servers. You may deploy it by way of containers that fit your particular knowledge storage and processing location necessities.
💡
Key options:
1. Common doc evaluation (learn/structure)
2. Pre-built enterprise doc fashions
3. Customized neural mannequin coaching
4. Doc classification
5. Container-based deployment
6. Azure service integration
7. Constructed-in validation guidelines
8. Multi-language assist
9. Human evaluation workflows
Professionals of Azure DI | Cons of Azure DI |
---|---|
On-premises deployment possibility | Advanced preliminary configuration |
Pre-built enterprise fashions | Requires technical experience |
Robust Azure integration | Studying curve for superior options |
Customized neural fashions | Updates may cause disruptions |
Doc classification | Price administration complexity |
Container assist | Documentation gaps |
Enterprise safety | |
A number of deployment decisions |
Pricing: Pay-as-you-go based mostly on pages processed. Free tier consists of 500 pages month-to-month. Enterprise pricing obtainable for prime volumes.
Greatest suited to: Enterprises throughout healthcare, finance, and authorities sectors that have to course of paperwork within the cloud and on their servers.
How does Azure Kind Recognizer evaluate to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Azure DI |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
8.5 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.0 |
8.9 |
High quality of Help |
8.5 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
9.0 |
8.8 |
Product Course (% constructive) |
9.2 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Azure Doc Intelligence while you want extra management over the place your doc processing occurs. It could even be a sensible choice if you happen to already use Microsoft providers.
5. Google Cloud Doc AI

Document AI represents Google’s enterprise method to doc processing. A part of the corporate’s cloud division, it combines OCR, pure language processing, and machine studying to remodel unstructured paperwork into actionable knowledge. It gives an end-to-end platform for doc processing, evaluation, and storage.
💡
Key options:
1. Common doc processors (OCR, splitter, parser)
2. Pre-built enterprise processors
3. Doc AI Workbench for customized fashions
4. Doc AI Warehouse for storage
5. Human-in-loop evaluation capabilities
6. Built-in processing console
7. Multi-language assist
8. Batch processing limitations
9. API-first structure
Professionals of Doc AI | Cons of Doc AI |
---|---|
Intensive pre-built processors | Restricted batch processing |
Robust ML/AI capabilities | Advanced pricing construction |
Built-in storage resolution | Requires technical experience |
Human evaluation workflows | Larger studying curve |
Google Cloud integration | Enterprise-focused pricing |
Common mannequin enhancements | Documentation gaps |
Robust OCR accuracy | |
Versatile deployment |
Pricing: Pay-as-you-go based mostly on doc processing quantity. Free tier obtainable for testing. Enterprise pricing obtainable for prime volumes.
Greatest suited to: Enterprises processing diverse doc varieties at scale, particularly those who require advanced evaluation. If an integration with Google Cloud is smart to what you are promoting.
How does Google Cloud Doc AI evaluate to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Google Cloud Doc AI |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
8.7 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.5 |
8.9 |
High quality of Help |
8.0 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
8.8 |
8.8 |
Product Course (% constructive) |
9.2 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Doc AI if what you are promoting wants highly effective ML/AI capabilities and pre-built for advanced doc processing wants. Nonetheless, do observe that its enterprise focus could also be overkill for less complicated use circumstances. It really works effectively while you want sturdy OCR capabilities mixed with doc storage and search.
6. ABBYY FlexiCapture

ABBYY FlexiCapture is a strong clever doc processing platform that automates the seize, classification, and knowledge extraction from all kinds of doc varieties and codecs. Not like Textract’s cloud-only mannequin, FlexiCapture affords each on-premises and cloud deployment choices, making it appropriate for organizations with strict knowledge safety and compliance necessities.
Learn Extra: ABBYY FlexiCapture Alternatives and Competitors
💡
Key options:
1. Superior OCR for structured and unstructured paperwork
2. AI-based knowledge seize and extraction
3. Clever doc classification and separation
4. Scalable batch processing for prime volumes
5. Customizable enterprise guidelines and validation
6. Multi-channel enter (scanner, e mail, fax, cell)
7. Seamless integration with BPM, RPA, and ECM methods
8. Versatile deployment choices (on-premises, cloud, hybrid)
9. Multi-language assist
Professionals of FlexiCapture | Cons of FlexiCapture |
---|---|
Extremely correct knowledge extraction | Advanced setup and configuration |
Handles numerous doc codecs | Steep studying curve |
Scalable for high-volume processing | Larger upfront funding |
Strong integration capabilities | Requires specialised IT expertise to take care of |
Versatile deployment choices | |
Robust compliance and security measures |
Pricing: Primarily based on the variety of pages processed yearly, with the fee per web page lowering as quantity will increase. On-premises and cloud-based pricing fashions can be found, with on-premises requiring a better upfront funding however decrease ongoing prices. Precise pricing is just not publicly disclosed.
Greatest suited to: Enterprises and organizations with high-volume doc processing wants and strict compliance necessities, like healthcare, finance, and authorities.
How does ABBYY FlexiCapture evaluate to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
ABBYY FlexiCapture |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
8.8 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.0 |
8.9 |
High quality of Help |
8.5 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
9.0 |
8.8 |
Product Course (% constructive) |
10.0 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select FlexiCapture if you happen to want enterprise-grade doc processing with sturdy batch capabilities and versatile deployment choices. The platform significantly shines when processing excessive volumes of advanced paperwork with strict compliance necessities.
7. Tungsten Seize (previously Kofax Seize)

Tungsten Capture is a doc scanning and knowledge extraction resolution that automates the conversion of paper paperwork into digital knowledge. It focuses on high-volume doc scanning, OCR, and knowledge seize.
Learn About: Kofax Alternatives and Competitors
💡
Key options:
1. Superior doc scanning and picture processing
2. Clever doc separation and classification
3. Automated knowledge extraction utilizing OCR and ICR
4. VRS (VirtualReScan) expertise for picture enhancement
5. Integration with different Tungsten Modules for superior knowledge extraction
6. Help for a variety of scanners and multi-function gadgets
7. Scalable structure for high-volume processing
8. Batch processing and workflow automation capabilities
9. Centralized administration and monitoring
Professionals of Tungsten Seize | Cons of Tungsten Seize |
---|---|
Extremely correct OCR and knowledge extraction | Advanced setup and configuration |
Handles numerous doc varieties and codecs | Steep studying curve |
Highly effective picture enhancement with VRS | Larger upfront prices |
Scalable for high-volume processing | Requires on-premises infrastructure |
Intensive customization choices | Restricted out-of-the-box integrations |
Mature and confirmed expertise | Older consumer interface design |
Pricing: Pricing is predicated on the variety of pages scanned yearly, with quantity reductions obtainable. Extra prices might apply for add-on modules, skilled providers, and upkeep. Precise pricing is just not publicly disclosed, but it surely sometimes entails a major upfront funding and ongoing upkeep charges.
Greatest suited to: Organizations with high-volume, centralized doc scanning necessities, similar to shared service facilities, BPOs, and enormous enterprises with devoted scanning departments.
How does Tungsten Seize evaluate to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Tungsten Seize |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
8.5 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.0 |
8.9 |
High quality of Help |
8.7 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
8.8 |
8.8 |
Product Course (% constructive) |
9.0 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Tungsten Seize if you happen to want a strong, on-premises resolution for high-volume doc scanning and knowledge extraction. Its superior picture processing, batch scanning capabilities, and in depth customization choices make it appropriate for advanced doc seize wants and present infrastructure.
8. Laserfiche

Laserfiche is a complete enterprise content material administration (ECM) and enterprise course of automation platform that features strong doc seize and processing capabilities. It affords an end-to-end resolution that mixes clever doc seize, safe storage, workflow automation, and data administration.
💡
Key options:
1. Clever doc seize and classification
2. Workflow designer for course of automation
3. Digital types and digital signatures
4. Doc administration and model management
5. Information administration and retention insurance policies
6. Safe doc storage and entry management
7. Cellular doc seize and entry
8. Varied integration choices and APIs
Professionals | Cons |
---|---|
Complete content material administration | Larger upfront prices |
Highly effective workflow automation | Steeper studying curve |
Robust safety and compliance | Requires IT assets to implement and keep |
Extremely customizable and extensible | Might require skilled providers for advanced implementations |
Scalable for enterprise deployments | |
Deep integration with enterprise methods |
Pricing: Provides each on-premises and cloud-based deployment choices, with pricing based mostly on the variety of customers and particular modules required. You will get a free trial for its cloud-based resolution.
Greatest suited to: Organizations throughout industries, significantly these with advanced doc administration and compliance necessities, similar to authorities businesses, instructional establishments, monetary providers corporations, and healthcare suppliers.
How does Laserfiche evaluate to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Laserfiche |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
8.8 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.0 |
8.9 |
High quality of Help |
8.9 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
9.0 |
8.8 |
Product Course (% constructive) |
9.2 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Laserfiche if you happen to want a complete resolution that mixes doc processing with doc administration, workflow automation, and data administration. It is significantly useful while you want sturdy safety, compliance, and auditing capabilities alongside doc seize.
9. Hyperscience

Hyperscience is an clever doc processing platform that mixes AI, ML, and human-in-the-loop workflows to automate knowledge extraction, classification, and validation. It affords an end-to-end resolution that handles advanced, variable, and low-quality paperwork with excessive accuracy and automation charges.
Learn About: Hyperscience Alternatives and Competitors
💡
Key options:
1. AI-powered knowledge extraction and classification
2. Help for structured, semi-structured, and unstructured paperwork
3. ICR for handwritten textual content and low-quality photographs
4. Human-in-the-loop workflows for exception dealing with and validation
5. Customizable workflows and integration with present methods
6. Steady studying and mannequin enchancment
7. Safe and compliant infrastructure
Professionals of Hyperscience | Cons of Hyperscience |
---|---|
Excessive accuracy and automation charges | Larger value in comparison with standalone options |
Handles advanced, variable, and low-quality paperwork | Longer preliminary setup and configuration |
Human-in-the-loop workflows for exception dealing with | Might require important coaching knowledge for customized fashions |
Integration with enterprise methods | |
Steady studying and enchancment | |
Devoted buyer success staff and assist |
Pricing: Provides customized pricing.
Greatest suited to: Enterprises with advanced, high-volume doc processing wants, significantly these coping with variable, unstructured, or low-quality paperwork. Industries similar to monetary providers, insurance coverage, healthcare, and authorities could possibly automate claims processing, account opening, and bill processing, with excessive accuracy and effectivity.
How does Hyperscience evaluate to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Hyperscience |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
9.3 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
9.0 |
8.9 |
High quality of Help |
9.1 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
9.1 |
8.8 |
Product Course (% constructive) |
9.8 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Hyperscience when you could automate advanced, high-stakes processes or in case your use-case entails processing all kinds of doc varieties. It may embrace handwritten types, low-quality scans, or unstructured knowledge.
How to decide on the perfect Amazon Textract different?
At Nanonets, we course of tens of millions of paperwork month-to-month for over 500 enterprises, together with 35% of Fortune 500 firms. This offers us distinctive insights into what works (and what does not) in doc processing. We have seen firsthand how companies wrestle to search out the suitable doc processing resolution, particularly when evaluating Amazon Textract alternate options.
For the aim of this comparability, we evaluated Textract alternate options based mostly on:
- Actual efficiency knowledge from processing tens of millions of paperwork
- Direct suggestions from enterprise shoppers who switched platforms
- Unbiased consumer evaluations from G2, Capterra, Gartner, and TrustRadius
- Palms-on testing by our doc processing consultants
Scoring methodology*
We have evaluated every different throughout 5 key parameters that matter most to organizations switching from Textract:
- Ease of use: How shortly groups can begin utilizing the device with out in depth AWS experience
- Ease of setup: Implementation effort, particularly in comparison with Textract’s AWS-centric setup
- High quality of assist: Availability and responsiveness of assist, a typical ache level with Textract
- Meets necessities: Capacity to deal with doc processing wants past Textract’s capabilities
- Product path: Steady enchancment and have growth tempo
Product | Ease of Use | Ease of Setup | High quality of Help | Meets Necessities | Product Course | Whole Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amazon Textract | 8.9 | 8.9 | 8.6 | 8.8 | 8.2 | 43.4 |
Nanonets | 9.3 | 9.1 | 9.4 | 9.1 | 9.6 | 46.5 |
Rossum | 8.5 | 8.0 | 9.2 | 8.3 | 9.8 | 43.8 |
Docparser | 9.0 | 8.8 | 8.9 | 8.7 | 8.5 | 44.0 |
Azure DI | 8.5 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 43.2 |
Google Cloud Doc AI | 8.7 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 8.8 | 9.2 | 43.2 |
ABBYY FlexiCapture | 8.8 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 10.0 | 44.3 |
Tungsten Seize | 8.5 | 8.0 | 8.7 | 8.8 | 9.0 | 43.0 |
Laserfiche | 8.8 | 8.0 | 8.9 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 43.9 |
Hyperscience | 9.3 | 9.0 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 9.8 | 46.3 |
Key resolution elements
Primarily based on widespread challenges organizations face with Textract, think about these facets:
Doc complexity necessities
- Do you want higher handwriting recognition than Textract affords?
- Are you processing advanced tables or types?
- Do you could deal with a number of languages successfully?
AWS dependency issues
- How tightly built-in are you with AWS providers?
- Would a cloud-agnostic resolution supply extra flexibility?
- Do you want on-premises deployment choices?
Price construction preferences
- Is Textract’s per-page pricing mannequin working in your quantity?
- Do you want extra predictable pricing?
- What’s your month-to-month doc processing quantity?
Integration wants
- Past AWS providers, what methods want to attach?
- Do you want pre-built connectors to widespread enterprise instruments?
- How necessary is API flexibility?
Automation necessities
- Do you want workflow automation capabilities?
- Is batch processing necessary in your use case?
- Do you require human-in-the-loop options?
💡
– Characteristic units and capabilities might have modified
– Pricing fashions would possibly differ from what’s listed
– Efficiency metrics may range based mostly in your particular use case
– Integration choices might have expanded
– New options might have been added
We advocate reaching out to distributors instantly for probably the most present info and testing any resolution completely together with your precise paperwork earlier than making a call.
Whereas business options supply complete options and assist, organizations with technical assets or monetary constrainst can also think about open-source alternate options for doc processing.
Tesseract OCR, maintained by Google, is without doubt one of the most established open-source OCR engines obtainable. An alternative choice is EasyOCR, which affords a Python library for OCR with assist for handwriting recognition and a number of languages.
Nonetheless, not like the business alternate options mentioned above, open-source options sometimes require important technical experience to implement and keep and sometimes want extra growth work to match options like kind subject extraction, desk evaluation, and workflow automation that come customary with business platforms.
FAQs
What’s the distinction between ABBYY and Textract?
ABBYY FlexiCapture is a complete doc processing platform that features superior OCR, workflow automation, and enterprise integration capabilities. It affords each cloud and on-premises deployment choices. Amazon Textract, as compared, is a cloud-only service targeted particularly on knowledge extraction and doc evaluation, built-in with AWS providers.
What’s the distinction between OCR and Textract?
OCR (Optical Character Recognition) is a expertise that converts photographs of textual content into machine-readable textual content. Amazon Textract goes past fundamental OCR by utilizing machine studying to not solely acknowledge textual content but in addition perceive doc construction, extract kind fields, and analyze tables mechanically. Whereas OCR merely converts textual content, Textract gives structured knowledge output and understanding of doc relationships.
Amazon Textract is a machine studying service that mechanically extracts textual content, handwriting, and knowledge from scanned paperwork. It is a part of AWS’s AI providers, designed to course of paperwork at scale with out guide intervention. The service can determine and extract knowledge from types and tables whereas sustaining the unique doc’s construction and relationships.
Can Textract extract photographs?
Textract processes photographs to extract textual content and knowledge from them, but it surely does not extract photographs themselves. It might probably analyze photographs containing paperwork, types, tables, and handwritten textual content, however its goal is to extract textual info and knowledge fairly than picture content material.